──Could you also tell us about the title of this exhibition? Your exhibition titles are always quite unique — “Treading Along the Window” (2021), “The Walking Bride” (2022), “U” (2025) — and they always connect to the works on display and the concepts behind them. This time you’ve given it the title “Knots and Pebbles.” What was the thinking behind that choice?
Aoki I gave it a title that refers to movement and units. I took the square as a unit, and the fractal structure inherent in the square contains a dynamism of infinite contraction and expansion. Ultimately, the word “pebble” (tsubute in Japanese) emerged as a term associated with this unit.
──Going by that logic, does that mean the first square piece represents a “knot?”
Aoki Yes. It is a “knot,” and the beginning of a “pebble.”
──And, those elements expand, or rather, proliferate, turning into multi-panel works…
The press release for this exhibition mentions the concept of a four-dimensional cube. It is an unfamiliar concept to most, and to be completely honest, I found some parts of it difficult to grasp myself. What originally sparked your interest in four-dimensional geometry? Your previous work has often seemed to move back and forth between two and three dimensionality, but what was the catalyst that sparked your interest in or awareness of the fourth dimension in your creative practice?
Aoki I don’t understand the fourth dimension either. (Laughs.) However, I think of it as a metaphor for people’s active thinking and physicality.
If I look back at my practice, a large part of my interest is where the painting is established in the first place. The cubism and collage practiced by Georges Braque and Pablo Picasso were great inventions that folded space-time in two dimensions. I would like to try to reopen what is being folded. I start this process by adding time to this three-dimensional space we live in. It comes from wanting to intervene in the time both within the canvas and outside it.
If the dimensional perception changes, the way we perceive the very environment in which we live also changes. I want to try doing this through painting. Of course, the fourth dimension cannot be perceived. It can’t — but I hope to be able to touch a fragment of it if I can combine it with painting’s inherent ability to move back and forth through space-time.
──You just mentioned the concept of time, and my initial thought was that a distinct awareness of time must be at play here. However, my first impression of the square work was that it felt very much like a still image, as if you had captured a single, fleeting moment of movement and deliberately extracted it. Is there some kind of conscious approach on your part to subvert or invert that dynamic?
Aoki There is also an element of cutting or severing, like the blinking of an eye. (In this exhibition, I’m also presenting new works from a series inspired by blinking.) And, I have created the work as something that is made whole through the intervention of the person standing in front of it — something that is amplified by the presence of a person.
──So, with those four canvases, each one is structured by the spray paint applied from a different direction, or something to that effect?
Aoki Yes, I wanted to create a situation where there’s something like a magnetic field — or maybe I should say, a twisted state.
──Does that also explain why you chose to hang the work on the wall vertically, rather than horizontally?
Aoki While I’m making the work, I lay it flat, or tilt it slightly and let gravity help dry the paint. When I’m making a larger piece, I sometimes stand on a stepladder and look down at it. As I continue to look at portions of it from various directions while I work, I’m always looking at fragments of time. That eventually ends up hanging on the wall in a twisted way. That’s exactly the point you picked up on when you said the work is interesting as something horizontal. Even though it’s hung on the wall, you can intervene from many different coordinates.